Creationism (or Intelligent Design/ID as it's bible-brandishing fans label it) is crock load of the smelliest turds you've ever laid mixed with burnt hair and vomit. As a scientific theory it has about much use as a dwarf in a basketball game. It seems that recently enough of the lunatic, sabre-rattling, dunderheaded, piss flaps who espouse this bagfull of bollocks have got together for the government of this country to consider teaching it as an alternative to evolution in schools. This isn't Alabama, it's the fucking UK. Teaching our children creationism is akin to teaching them that storks are an alternative to reproduction. It's lunacy of the highest order.Charles Darwin was a clever fucker. He looked at the world and postulated that there was order in the madness, that all animals shared common ancestors and that laws of nature governed how the creatures we know now came to be. He said that through a series of random mutations creatures gradually changed, and if any of these mutations were useful to the creature to survive in their environment, that creature had an advantage and was more likely to survive than other creatures of it's species, and would eventually become the norm over a period of thousands and millions of years. He wrote all this down in a book, The Origin of Species, and since then his theory has been debated, changed, tested and corroborated hundreds of times in scientific study with empirical evidence. He also looked like a bloke that knows what he's talking about.From the war of nature, from famine and death, the most exalted object which we are capable of conceiving, namely, the production of the higher animals, directlyfollows. There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been breathed into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved.- Charles Darwin
Creationists are simple-minded, bewildered fuckwits with no concept of science. They looked at the bible and, without questioning a book that is only called the word of God because some bloke said so, was written years after the death of the main character, is based on sources more spurious than wikipedia, and actively condones the stoning to death of adulterers, accepted all it contains. They say the world is 6,000 years old, was made in 6 days by God, and that the reason we wear clothes is because of a talking snake. Creationists laugh in the face of reason, science and evidence and run away with their fingers in their ears humming loudly. They also have a habit of looking like this:
Fuck science, whatever those bigoted, pig-ignorant, hate mongering cuntbags believe in I'm against.
Seriously, you're more likely to have a rational conversation with a man called 'Stench' with tattoos of severed cocks on his face than your average creationist.
Creationists try to point to supposed 'holes' in evolutionary theory, holes that have often long been filled by science and the discovery of more and more 'missing links'. In science, unlike in fundamentalist religion, if there is one problem with something you don't throw the whole thing away. A lack of evidence, in any case, would not be evidence for an opposing theory. They also neglect to mention that whilst there are some as-yet missing links for evolution, creationism is based on something that someone made up, a fucking fairy tale. With a
talking snake. And a man who lived in a whale. Oh, and apparently some fella rounded up two of every animal on earth (even the really little ones) and put them on a boat to stop God drowning them. My main problem with that is how he managed to keep all the animals alive long enough for him to get them back to the boat on foot, it doesn't add up somehow. Creationists have used the Grand Canyon as evidence of the Great Flood, claiming that 5,000 feet of granite, slate and other really hard stuff was carved in a matter of days after a natural dam burst after a huge flood. Creationists are worse geologists than they are biologists.The fans of creationism have a nasty habit of manipulation of the truth, lies of omission, taking quotations out of context and bare-faced lying. They claim Darwin didn't believe in his own theories. That's clearly complete shit. They claim Newton's second law supports creation, but omit the first line that destroys that idea. They use the words 'science' and 'supernatural' in the same sentence.
Creationism can be boiled down to this sentence: "I don't understand". Creationists are baffled as to how a world this complex, beautiful and full of cunts can have happened by chance, someone, they claim, must have made it. This is to miss the point of evolutionary theory by a distance greater than Paula Radcliffe can run before shitting herself. Natural selection is the polar opposite of chance, it is governed by very strict laws of nature. Once again, the creationist argument falls short.
One of the tricksiest, sneakiest, slipperiest things creationism fans do is do deny it's links to religion. Some never use the words 'God' and 'creationism' and instead use the words 'Intelligent Design' in order to make their dullard crackpottery sound more scientific. Don't let them fool you. It's good ol' Jesus and Co. they're supporting, and it's all about religion. No-one without faith can even begin to contemplate such a shit-eating mad theory.
The crux of their argument is that evolution and creation are competing sides in a scientific debate, and as such, should both be taught in science lessons. This is exactly the same as saying there is a historical debate as to whether the holocaust happened, and as such, both sides of the argument should be taught in history lessons. In both cases there is no such debate, and one side of the argument is made up of lunatics spouting idiocy based on nothing more than what they think.
If you choose to believe in God and creation, fine, more power to you, but you can't teach children those beliefs based on blind faith in schools. Science is falsifiable and can be tested. Faith can't, and as such is not science. Creation in schools must be confined to R.E. lessons. I don't want the next generation of British kids thinking you can just make up science.
Evolution is the law of policies: Darwin said it, Socrates endorsed it, Cuvier proved it and established it for all time in his paper on “The Survival of the Fittest.” These are illustrious names, this is a mighty doctrine: nothing can ever remove it from its firm base, nothing dissolve it, but evolution.- Mark Twain [Samuel Langhorne Clemens]



